Bio ~ engineering.

My first major was Chemical Engineering at USC before a stint in their East Asian Languages and Cultures Department.*  After a sabbatical for a number of years, the result was a BA in Liberal Studies at the University of Washington.

[anachronistic writing]**
*removing the impression that I am at all responsible for the hyperlink
** the following are notes in progress akin to side notes on a page being read

NOTES:
Madhyamaka     /     Dialetheist       crazy ~  unmattaka
M-theory of D {?}
Paraconsistent Logic
Paradox ~ ironic ~ rhetorical device
Conceptualization ~/~ falsifies

Nietzsche: tT~ER (eternal recurrence)
Radical Contextualist Semantics ~requires meaning
Statement ~\~ truthmaker (not required)

=====================   segue   ==========
W-Theory  ~ Milo Wolff
Logical Positivism   Fusion v. Confluence
Defluence is the struggle[!]
=====================   theory?==========
LEVEL TWO NOTES:
W for Wolff AND Wave
Not to mention paradox of M.
Model / Madhyamaka / meaning?
D for Dialetheist, Dimensions and Design
Even rougher notes:
Paraconsistent Wittgenstein
Popper's poker.
=============
Then there is Methane[!]
Big T, and small t: Truth and Tetrahedron
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

* asterisk info only added 5-2-16
Pardon my style.

Rough Groundwork

con~sciousness, the paradox ? NFRY

Previously Read.

All Flat Statements Are Wrong.

Paradox or naut? 

(fn?) 1. googled phrase in heading
2. facebooked Philosphy Now
3. blogsearched PN
Re:labels

Translation: 3 points determine a plane *
hint/d'ribble: 4d fair lane ?
[two ends against reality?]


tag: all flat statements are wrong
 
* is not a flat statement
3 points are a plane is a flat statement
to determine takes another dimension

A flat statement only has three points in one plane. 
noun + verb ~ has more than three dimensions
noun + verb ~ maybe true (knot?)







FYI: possibly the grand conundrum
A statement of what is flat takes another perspective.
Therefore it is not flat, therefore outside this plane statement.

Wittgenstein

Theory of Philosophy ?

Letting you read so I don't have to?  To pun on...basker ville?

To cut the roar shack, not to Hume or Mill, but a mathematical physicist once told me,(to paraphrase) "everything we can think is only a model".

 

 

To Re Pair a Dime

 

 

knot pare a docks{*}

=======================================================

 

 

===================

Colbert Bama Bohemian Gravity

 

 

Tikkun

 

(FP)

{*} Post (FP) inserted paradox of 8&9  



Bricks and stones

no bones about it?

Too many threads.*
Still in the process of reading the links embedded and woven aknew[!]***

*2-24-13 

[a different Handy**]
[not to get a degree in Bacon but sometimes shelves are handy]
** found on one of my shelves.

***  Rhee-Marshall-Handy
In Charles Handy's The Age of Paradox,(**) there are two chapters I navigated to, but first I would say that every age is a paradox, as that is the nature of nature. Anyway, they are The Federal Idea p. 109) under Practicing the Preaching, which referenced back to the Sigmoid Curve(p. 49) under Finding the Balance.  I would like to weave in the Paradox of Choice by Bob Schwartz to determine if management of information and business is what education should be based on. 

Forbes Thought Of The Day
“Money never starts an idea; it is the idea that starts the money.”
— William J. Cameron

[See under degree / on, (b.s.)finds "tetra+heed+run" / "Platonic+plank" = Education/Business/Government loopiness. Not to suggest nonsense or SixSigma, but a Six Edged 4Mat of dynamics and what matters and is the point, balancing change and individual freedoms.  (Platonic Platforming and Planks Constant?)]

Not to suggest a tipping of the tetrahedron, or BEG the work of N-title meants but which comes first? Business/Education/Government slash results or causes and affects of design?

by Stiob?!?

D-google:
I reference this indirectly** in terms of how* I get here***.

*Ctrl F "ananchronist"
** ouch (practical stiob?)
*** "stiob"
(The "stiob" of practical*the link* is more a tan/gent shall.)
[Not to pun on more asterisks, but the dimentionalism might be.^]

^ [or (fn) IS! ]

[ submitted for yo/re consideration ?  / ! ... ]

[12-21-12: Project Salon Pause^^ ... Not !]
Also note that (fn) *link* was inserted on this date.
^^ (Ce ne pas, pax) Politics is something/everything paradox.(ouch)
(the last *^^* was paradox placement)
[Speaking of trilogies, trolls and toll-keens, my stumble upon "stiob" was via Starship Troopers 2: Hero of the Federation (Or American Exceptionalism: Too Point Oh!)]
[A fellow tangent?(rise over run)]
[ SO ? ]

Presidential Press Conference.

TO BE INSERTED ...

Meanwhile: Paradox link inserted.

(Image of Original In Tent)


[C-Span (1st)link inserted post conn text*.]

* (i.e. all of above)
(fn) in progress.

Perspectivism

It is hard to get out of your own prism.*

* filter
[I'd rather be a paradox**, than pare a patient with a pair o'dice.]












** link inserted 12-19-12

DECEMBER 2012 FOOTNOTES (fn) PAGE

[Begun 12-3-12.]

12-28-12 [ = (b.s.)pondering :
State of Politics
A Revolution? (scroll click)
Un-Exceptionalism (SC)
Punderous Ponderings (ibid) ] = /knot/ ( Try-unism ? ! ? )  ?
& (this is a test of sorts under the classification of filters/sources and progress)

12-22-12 Speaking of Will to Footnotes:(I will note the sequence of my link inserts{such})
Speaking of ge oh metric(or me trick) projects. (fn)GIGO(or MoJoe)
{ge oh metrics}
me
trick
projects
{speaking}(to be continued or Kantinued)

12-21-12 ^^ "paradox placement" anachronistically where the *ouch* was where the "pas" link is Treason of Imagery, with the "pax" link inserted retroactively, and lastly the "ouch" link inserted  All to pun(or parse) on pause, stiob and SignField)

12-20-12 By golly of sorts ^ (i.e. by google, by stiob)
Under the IS(^) is 5A, and here they Be ! (or R )

12-19-12 : Presidential Press Conference.
Links from bottom up.

"text"= (b.s. slippery=slope) a. Try Angle b. The Nature of Things^
 e.^ Flow of Conscience (a. thru s.)

"conn"(b.s. P+B+M+P) a. #1 Discipline - Philosophy ^^ b. The Tetrahedron Ramble* c. Looking Back, and Moving On. d.  Proof of Process? e. Geometry of Purpose f. Use of Labels g. Rachell Maddow Wants You! [talking points]  h. The Mess Age is the Message!

(1st)link: Presidential Press Conference
[pun on conn text: we have the conn!]

^ scroll over in-directly effective
^^ technically only a.^^^ works in scroll over
(i.e. rest link previous post)
^^^ except d. and f. for some reason


12-18-12 Perspectivism : a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l ?

12-18-12 "buying a stairway"  (POSTED 12-17-12) [under consideration]

12-5-12 Joke of the Year!
http://www.seattlepi.com/news/politics/article/Analysis-Obama-could-risk-going-over-cliff-4091855.php#ixzz2EC9tWNey
political = Contempt for Courage
leverage = Fiddle Sticks^
Ctrl F = Nail Meet F--C---[!] (Full Crumb?)
time = (b.s.) "will+expire" (FN)  ALSO Re:"time" will expire.

12-4-12 Pre-Pan FRY :
Original links pre-comment.
Why It's Hard to Replace the 'Fiscal Cliff' Metaphor.
asterisks.
[ read. ]
***  (kitchen)
[Post-comment]

12-4-12
The Place for Politics link that triggered my comment is not yet found.

12-2-12: as amended:
 ... Re:sources - not too pan or FRY.]
[...prE-links and post ponds.]
BTW: Is it better to fry two fish with one pan than kill or flip any birds or count bushes?
[Pre-C Hawks ?! ]

12-1-12 Links inserted. * Not too Die-jesting [!]
Washington Week
Facts...
algorithms
leverage
(rough issues/links)

12-3-12 Fiddle Sticks (hyperlinks included in pst as follows)
Boehner tells Geithner, ‘You can’t be
White House to GOP: It’s your move
“The Hobbit” is not a hipster!

In "F"n able?

[FOOTNOTE PAGE FOR NOVEMBER 2012]
Posted Tuesday 11-6-12 as Time Stamped.
Most recent at top.

11-30  (fn) this under construction.

11-23-12  Cautious Black Friday!!!! 
Strunk - http://www.bartleby.com/141/strunk.html
(b.s. )^ Charotte + Web
FOOTNOTES: SEPTEMBER 2012
Give us a brake?
^ note yesterday's below correction (b.S.)= spots in this blogSpot

11-22-12 Happy Thanksgiving!!!!!!!
As for footnotes, all are b.S.(blog Spots) in order:
Transition - Nail Meet F--C---[!]
of* - Post Election
Sorts - Hump Day for Journalism
* - FC "Hammer"
anachronistic - Middle C?
caution - Local Journalism
C-VC(viscous^ cycle of sorts)
^(also 11-23-12) re:correction (these 2) are b.s.(blog searches)

11-10-12 That is the ticket![!] 6 S I G M A (OW!)

11-9-12 Stop that! Oh when the Saints...GM'nI(Annie Oakley?WarBucks)
M - F: (a ... o h ?)  [Bracket-EDS:  U-Tubes ( a, b, c, d ) Speaking of ana chonisms(sic).]

11-6-12 Hump Day for Journalism  I should have journaled links as inserted but here goes...not [!]^
^ paradox? (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i ?)
c c? In F able? e, f, ironic? (i.e. Q u b4^^ a,b, ... ?)
^^ Aftermath (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m )
For Achronism Sake. (Earlier post moved (and edited)to above the fold.)
[Not to bury the lede: R S N ? (spell check done [!])]
Update: Footnotes & here. (not)

11-6-12 Post Election
11-7-12 Pre-math?^  P.M. (not to pun on After Math, but Pincer Movement)
b.s.= blog search
? = b.s.(almond+joy)
day = facebook AM1090 Norman Goldman 88 Keys!
of = ** see "?"
spirit = Infamy?  Not EXACTLY[!]^^
the = b.s.(danger+field)
in = the P.I. Given 2nd term, Obama now facing new urgent task
[and this is only the f'n asterisks]
^after thought (NFRY)
^^ scroll over

REFRAIN is a Heckuva Paradocs[!]

(sic)or sarChasm of paradox: 
A return to economic sanity ? *

Appropriately there are only two links so far,
anachronistic^^ may they be: 
Andrew Leonard on the hope and change sanity at the Fed.
Sam Stein on raising the payroll cap on Social Secutity to fill the gap.

The Aster Risk[*] revolves on the Fight of the Century and Jon Stewart's take on "printing money" Bernanke**. (C-Mitt-\-warps)

Watch(out) for Lede Crack:*** 
"I don't want to be subjective, but it is my Austrian perspective."

* links Chasm and return Mitt time warps
** (a)YouTube, (b)60 Minutes, (c)NPR 
***(Step on a Rap)
[Lede Crack nails the paradox(fills the gap) of objective/subjectivism.]
Tacky Tact Tack: Romney Wrong Track^
Economy or Economics: NOT

^ Leder Tapes.
Mark Leder Tapes: Marc's pun on leader(and the twain)
[Belated Rebuttal or Re-Frame ? ]
(fn)
[^^ NOT TO MITT-FLOP: SNL(Salon Notes List) Marry X-mass [!] = (sic)]

[*] This footnote segues between Ding and A.(from earlier draft) leaving out the middle and emblematic of Mitt and his flip-flop of economics. (** a & b)  It is Keynesian not Supply or Demand. The Fight of the Century is a mockery of a satire on economics and the Deflation of Bernanke by Jon Stewart(**c) is a satire of a mockery of economics.
(fn)
[Um...Ouch ! ]

V for Victim

F for Fudging*

W for Wedge.**

* in"F"able

** not only Econ 101, but Physics and Psychology 101

Economy Killers: Inequality and GOP Ignorance

VFW :

Curve Wars? Bell Curve meets Laffer Curve.

[There is a paradox to the bell curve reference, or counter-intuitive meeting. How ironic the Laffer curve is a Bell curve, but their meeting results in The L-Curve.]

[It may be dangerous(i.e. fuzzy math and English) to insert irony or mixed metaphors/charts, but I will now switch streams.]

There seems to be an overly conservative perspective on government spending in the Krugman/Wells article with the use of the word temporary:

In 2008 we suddenly found ourselves living in a Keynesian world — that is, a world that very much had the features John Maynard Keynes focused on in his 1936 magnum opus, “The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.” By that we mean that we found ourselves in a world in which lack of sufficient demand had become the key economic problem, and in which narrow technocratic solutions, like cuts in the Federal Reserve’s interest rate target, were not adequate to that situation. To deal effectively with the crisis, we needed more activist government policies, in the form both of temporary spending to support employment and efforts to reduce the overhang of mortgage debt.

It ignores the long-term infrastructure deficit otherwise know as investment in our infrastructure. Given the skewed GOP perspective on cutting spending over recovering taxes and investing in the country, it is no wonder growth, which is not the answer*** alone anyway, is not faring well.

Note fuzzy, not to mention capitalized Bell and un-capitalized bell curve.(ouch)

Related economics, INET. Related Salon, NFR.

***(Crtl F) "growth"

4-16-12 Not exploit veterans(V F W), but W is playing the victim card here.

My Respects to Those who Celebrate.

Happy Easter.
Now for a tangent. Which implies that I am spinning off of something, which I might say later.

It occurred to me recently that there appear to be three(or4) grand metaphors; growth, transportation and game themed.

In trying to establish some foundation, (that makes four: structure) I recalled: Occam's Razor and Chaos Theory, until I remembered the Incompleteness Theorems.

Math is next to Godliness!

Chaos Theory and the Justice Paradox:

"[T]he laws have mistakes, and you can't go writing up a law for
everything that you can imagine."'
"When you reach an equilibrium in biology you're dead."

Not pun on Easter Seals.

Anachronistic Reasoning?

Rational Actors?

The X-Factor?

Not Exactly.

[Note: it was not my original intent to post so much comment. A reading of the asterisks in order,(* through ***) may help the flow of reasoning, such as it is. (i.e. get to *** before reading asterisks.)]

Chomsky/Pillar.

The dilemma*** of dealing with irrational actors, seems to argue that the reason for not allowing Iran to get nuclear weapons, is the same reason for supporting the Republicans for leadership: Only irrational actors can deal with irrational actors.**

Ironically it seems that it is the same reason for nuclear proliferation. Nuclear arms are needed to prevent the will of an enemy from being forced on one's homeland. Hence the irrational* also enforces the rationale that Iran needs nuclear arms for rational reasons.

This is not to argue for nuclear proliferation or disarmament, only to expose the paradox of expecting forces to be irrational, except when it is one's own. And this certainly does not argue for Republican leadership, at least as it expects to enforce their rational behavior on irrational bases. Such rationale is only loose talk or worse, intentional escalation of world tensions, and certainly not incentive for nuclear non-proliferation, global understanding or economic progress.

* not so irrational in the foundations here: as it is irrational to claim that Iran is irrational as a rational for preventing their nuclear capabilities. It is rational just attempting to rationalize behavior despite potential irrationality of the players.

**dualing ironies or double down dueling[!]

[or just dualing down?]

*** this paradox is also rational

This piece is based on a reading of the Chomsky and Pillar pieces.(in light of the "Actors" clip) But not before a re-reading of the complete Kroenig piece in a paper bound edition of Foreign Affairs, not fully available here. I had not yet stumbled on these articles, which may shine more light on the exorcise here.[!] From the former of the last two:

Matthew Kroenig's argument for preventive military action to combat Tehran's nuclear program -- "Time to Attack Iran" (January/February 2012) -- suffers from three problems. First, its view of Iranian leaders' risk calculations is self-contradictory. Second, it misreads nuclear history. And third, it underestimates the United States' ability to contain a nuclear Iran. When these problems are addressed, it is clear that, contrary to what Kroenig contends, attacking Iran is not "the least bad option."

--

Kroenig's inconsistency is clear: If Iranian leaders are as reckless as he seems to believe, a preventive strike would likely escalate to a full-blown war. If they are not, then there is no reason to think that a nuclear Iran would be uncontainable.

[Bingo: just in! Generals against of war ! or "loose talk"^]

[No Fluke? Yeah Right! ...and more Breaking Presidential Press Conference ! And ABC Fact Check is not Fact Check.]

^[Under "loose talk" a self-deprecating reference to my occasions to both hear and speak in-person with General Eaton.]

[Note that "anachronistic" pertains to the reading of the sources and the top three lines, not to mention the ongoing nature of who's interests are reasonable or to be forced, in the flow of the rationalizing. (Also asterisks and late found sources.)]

[Not exactly breaking, but Ed Schultz notes that Bill O'Reilly believes it was "No Fluke", that Sandra Fluke did not get "in front of that committee" by accident. No, she was rejected by a House Committee and was forced to appear before a Democratic Sub-Committee.]

Cain un-Able

Dog gone pizza guy.

I am actually dissappointed that Cain may be un-able to represent the libertarian and wacky right in a prospective general election debate. But who knows.

Meanwhile... beetlejuice, beatle juice, Norman Goldman...podcasting has gone MO(members only).

Speaking of Voodoo or whatever I do do, in rendering and raveling the above ramble I may have met my limit*.

* for under The Big Dig are more links I've yet to count or need to count(11-03-11 or rather find).

[11-03-11: Archive for October 2011 is not all inclusive. Hence** under The Big Dig... Christie endorsed Romney / One Bad Apple / Never the Twain / Spoiler Alert! / Network Paradox- / I Heart OWS! / I'm a PC / Throwing the Game / What, Me Worry? / Take Back the American Dream / Retro-Gate / SEGUE FROM SEPTEMBER(Muffin-Gate)
Prequel*** : Occupy the Koch Brothers Battle Dream Teams]
[Minus Two Finds]
[Lincoln Search O W S]
** random (Xfinity) search of the day "Hence to cato"
***
[If anything can sum up the Voodoo that I do here: If only it were Black and White, or two dimentional or even three. (or fore)(let alone pre-determined. Not to mention Democratic wave theory, and more.]
[WE, in Kind?, or not?]

[Mediatwist? an interesting spin! Dead C Scroll over affirmative Trump. (Satire v. Sat Ire[!])]

Network Paradox-

ymoron.

AlanGrayson nails it.
Well, not exactly.

One party "Occupies Wall Street[!]"(OWS), the other is "Fair and Balanced".

Mad as HBO and not going to take it?

[My "parodoxymoron" is not aimed at a person, but the perspectivism of parties, and anti-relativism. My use refers to my one liner of contrast. My apologies to the WWW, I thought I coined something.]

No Frackin' Way

Nuclear power is one thing*, but Frackin' with our water?

* not green(except for trickle up)
[What the frack is the connection to Newt Gingrich, well the paradox of green and being able to be a paradox period. His frackin' campaign seems to be burning the candle on both ends. But this is too complex for me to explain, except for the idea that he commits to Lean Six Sigma,*** but not to the concepts his staff thinks it will take to win. Is this a bringing it to the table moment ala the silver lining of the churned media cloud? It is bad enough that Republicans have enough money to run their lies in ads and Faux News, but they have enough to add cloud to the process.]
[Not to** mention lame stream media.]

** way
*** last frackin' link

[Post comments footnote(see my two comments): There is nothing wrong with Six Sigma as a tool, but it may be besides the point, but not aside from the point of whose hands it is in, and for what purpose it is wielded(people or profit). In fact, I believe that "Lean Six Sigma" violates "Six Sigma" principles by having a target of 25% spending reduction, which demonstrates my point on purposes and whose hands should wield it for what. Aside from the point: what the frack is the point of government?]